Guarantees of Origin for Renewable Gas: Development of the Supervisory Framework - Dashboard

Closed10 Apr, 2025, 14:14 - 22 May, 2025, 17:30

Primary tabs

Status: 
Closed
Open Date: 
10.04.2025 - 14:14
Close Date: 
22.05.2025 - 17:30

Review Submissions

  • Stage 1 Comments
  • Stage 2 Proposal
  • Stage 3 Revisions

By Theme

Q1. Do you agree with the proposal to permit certain entities (producers traders and suppliers) as account holders in the Registry? And the associated allowable GO transactions?
Submissions 8
Observations 8
Q2. Respondents views are sought as to whether the proposed minimum information required for the various steps (e.g. for registration issuance to be included on a GO) is sufficient and can be fulfilled? Should any additional information be sought?
Submissions 5
Observations 5
Noting the proposal that in order for GNI to confirm that renewable gas volumes qualify as gas from a renewable source a valid sustainability certificate reference number issued by an EU voluntary scheme is required (section 2.2.2).
Submissions 0
Observations 0
Q3. Respondents views are sought on the issuance of GOs and whether monthly or alternative periods are preferred. As outlined in this paper (section 3.2.1) the CRU is proposing monthly periods for requests and transfers.
Submissions 4
Observations 4
Q4. The CRU has set out some key aspects in relation to a requirement for gas suppliers to complete an annual FMD and GSPV (as electricity suppliers are already required to do). Do respondents have any views in relation to this proposition?
Submissions 6
Observations 6
Q5. The financial and reporting arrangements in relation to the operation of the Registry are set out including the proposed annual fee of €5000 to be paid by each account holder. Respondents views are sought on the proposed arrangements.
Submissions 6
Observations 6
Q6. The CRU welcomes comments on any other proposal or details contained within this paper. Please reference the relevant section of the paper. (E.g. in relation to the scope of gGOs extending to grid-injected renewable gas only see section 1.3).
Submissions 11
Observations 11

By Observations

By Location

Theme Cloud

Q1. Do you agree with the proposal to permit certain entities (producers traders and suppliers) as account holders in the Registry? And the associated allowable GO transactions?
Q2. Respondents views are sought as to whether the proposed minimum information required for the various steps (e.g. for registration issuance to be included on a GO) is sufficient and can be fulfilled? Should any additional information be sought?
Noting the proposal that in order for GNI to confirm that renewable gas volumes qualify as gas from a renewable source a valid sustainability certificate reference number issued by an EU voluntary scheme is required (section 2.2.2).
Q3. Respondents views are sought on the issuance of GOs and whether monthly or alternative periods are preferred. As outlined in this paper (section 3.2.1) the CRU is proposing monthly periods for requests and transfers.
Q4. The CRU has set out some key aspects in relation to a requirement for gas suppliers to complete an annual FMD and GSPV (as electricity suppliers are already required to do). Do respondents have any views in relation to this proposition?
Q5. The financial and reporting arrangements in relation to the operation of the Registry are set out including the proposed annual fee of €5000 to be paid by each account holder. Respondents views are sought on the proposed arrangements.
Q6. The CRU welcomes comments on any other proposal or details contained within this paper. Please reference the relevant section of the paper. (E.g. in relation to the scope of gGOs extending to grid-injected renewable gas only see section 1.3).